Interpreting Reduced Costs as Opportunity Costs

Reduced costs measure the per-unit gap between a product's profit and the opportunity cost of the resources it consumes, priced at the shadow prices. This lesson interprets reduced costs as opportunity-cost differentials and uses them to evaluate whether a non-basic product should enter the production plan, the profit loss from forcing production, and the break-even profit at which a product becomes attractive.

Step 1 of 157%

Tutorial

Reduced Cost as Opportunity Cost

A firm solves a linear program to maximize profit subject to resource constraints. At the optimum, each resource ii has a shadow price yiy_i — the marginal value of one more unit of that resource.

Suppose product jj uses aija_{ij} units of resource ii per unit produced and earns cjc_j in profit per unit. The resources consumed by one unit of product jj have a total shadow-price value of

zj=iyiaij.z_j = \sum_{i} y_i\, a_{ij}.

This is the opportunity cost of one unit of product jj: the value of the resources it ties up, measured at their best-alternative use.

The reduced cost of product jj is its profit per unit minus its opportunity cost:

cˉj  =  cjiyiaij  =  cjzj.\bar{c}_j \;=\; c_j - \sum_{i} y_i\, a_{ij} \;=\; c_j - z_j.

It measures whether one unit of product jj earns more profit than the value of the resources it would consume.

Illustration. Suppose two resources have shadow prices y_1 = \3andandy_2 = $4.Product. Product Qusesusesa_{1Q}=2unitsofresource1andunits of resource 1 anda_{2Q}=1unitofresource2,withprofitunit of resource 2, with profitc_Q = $11$. Then

zQ=32+41=10,cˉQ=1110=1.z_Q = 3\cdot 2 + 4\cdot 1 = 10, \qquad \bar{c}_Q = 11 - 10 = 1.

Product QQ earns $1 more per unit than the resources it consumes are worth elsewhere.

navigate · Enter open · Esc close · ⌘K/Ctrl K toggle